Kristen Stewart in Clouds of Sils Maria |
This is happening with Kristen Stewart. Ever since she finished her run in the blockbuster Twilight Saga as Bella Swan in 2012, Stewart has been refocusing her career. She's choosing interesting projects, she's working with talented actors and directors, and she's getting some major notices. But all I've been seeing online is stuff like "OMG Kristen Stewart can act!" and lots of vaguely misogynistic backhanded compliments. Look, I don't know how Stewart feels about her years in the Twilight movies. I'd like to imagine that she's grateful for the fans she won over, for the gonzo money she made and for the fact that she starred in a film series that played directly to the hungry but oft-ignored female audience. The Twilight movies had their issues but we can thank them for Hunger Games, Pitch Perfect and other female-oriented blockbusters.
The fact that Kristen Stewart can hold her own against the likes of Julianne Moore and Juliette Binoche is surprising in the way that its cool to see any young actor go toe to toe with a veteran. But it shouldn't be this surprising. Stewart proved her worth on the screen in films like Adventureland, Into the Wild, The Runaways, Panic Room and Cake Eaters. Sure, the Twilight movies didn't do any favors for her. But let's be real, the only person who came out of those movies with her dignity intact is Anna Kendrick. Sure, when Robert Pattinson started doing work outside of Twilight, there was a level of surprise. The difference is that Pattinson came into Twilight virtually untested as an actor.
Personally I find it kinda insulting that critics and other filmgoers are acting as though suddenly Kristen Stewart became a great actor after being terrible for so long. The narrative for Stewart's reemergence as a critic-friendly actor should have been more "finally she has material worth her talents" not "omg who knew?!". When Matthew McConaughey had his "McConaissance," people were thankful that the guy who did great movies like A Time to Kill and Dazed and Confused was finally getting back to "legitimate" material. I'd make a point about how the aversion to rom-coms is institutionalized misogyny at its finest but truthfully the only McConaughey rom-com worth defending is How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days (maybe The Wedding Planner as well).
The fact that Kristen Stewart can hold her own against the likes of Julianne Moore and Juliette Binoche is surprising in the way that its cool to see any young actor go toe to toe with a veteran. But it shouldn't be this surprising. Stewart proved her worth on the screen in films like Adventureland, Into the Wild, The Runaways, Panic Room and Cake Eaters. Sure, the Twilight movies didn't do any favors for her. But let's be real, the only person who came out of those movies with her dignity intact is Anna Kendrick. Sure, when Robert Pattinson started doing work outside of Twilight, there was a level of surprise. The difference is that Pattinson came into Twilight virtually untested as an actor.
Kristen Stewart in Still Alice |
So I can only guess why the narrative surrounding Kristen Stewart is forgetting that her talents should be no surprise. I'll admit that watching her in the films Still Alice and Clouds of Sils Maria, I was taken back by how full of life she was. Her performances in those films are unlike anything she's ever done. In Clouds of Sils Maria, the film for which she became the first American actress to win a French Cesar Award, she completely transforms what we think of her as an actress and person. I could not take my eyes off her in that movie.
I think the issue is that unlike Harry Potter and Hunger Games, Twilight was never a "prestige" YA adaptation. Harry Potter and Hunger Games had multiple Oscar nominations in the cast and well-known British vets in the cast. But Twilight had lesser known B-actors and the misfortune of being primarily a romance series. The other 2 series had more masculine themes of good vs. evil and governmental control. So when Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson or Jennifer Lawrence do great work after their franchises, no really is that surprised. But because Stewart was part of something that critics primarily hated, they have to show faux-surprise when she's in something right up their alley.
Kristen Stewart is not having a comeback; she just survived a series of movies with bad press. What makes Kristen Stewart such an enigmatic figure in Hollywood is that she's cultivated such a strong public persona--brooding, take no BS, cool--that to see her be funny and charming and vivacious in both Sils Maria and Still Alice is weird enough to throw everyone for a loop. As much as I hate to compare them, she is the anti-J.Law, which is refreshing in this awkward-gal/Buzzfeed culture. While I admit I was never a huge Stewart fan, I definitely thinks she has something unique to offer the movie industry. I'm glad that is finally being recognized.
Like what you read? Please like my blog at Facebook.com/MathurMarquee. Also, follow me on Twitter @HippogriffRider. Agree? Disagree? Sound off in the comments below!
Kristen Stewart in the Twilight films |
Kristen Stewart is not having a comeback; she just survived a series of movies with bad press. What makes Kristen Stewart such an enigmatic figure in Hollywood is that she's cultivated such a strong public persona--brooding, take no BS, cool--that to see her be funny and charming and vivacious in both Sils Maria and Still Alice is weird enough to throw everyone for a loop. As much as I hate to compare them, she is the anti-J.Law, which is refreshing in this awkward-gal/Buzzfeed culture. While I admit I was never a huge Stewart fan, I definitely thinks she has something unique to offer the movie industry. I'm glad that is finally being recognized.
Like what you read? Please like my blog at Facebook.com/MathurMarquee. Also, follow me on Twitter @HippogriffRider. Agree? Disagree? Sound off in the comments below!
4 comments:
Awwww. Thank you for put in well written words exactly what I think.. Good job!
Kristen Stewart is a phenomenon. She is the ugly duck of the social media story. The first in almost everything, including the surreal witch hunting, bullying, that she endured for 7 yrs.
Just the notion that she survived to it, some how, sane, is outstanding.
For it is a mystery how a 17 yrs old survived to all this.
@Anonymous: What I like about Stewart is that she probably doesn't care at all what people write about her in the press. She does her thing and lets people catch up to her.
Great article! Thanks! Kristen has been a great actress since she was 9 years old really. Even during Twilight, she played Joan Jett in The Runaways and was great in Adventureland and no one cared, for the most part. The press used her as a punching bag for 4 years-well, more than that really. As the two posters above me said, it is a wonder Kristen stayed sane. She had family and good friends to keep her that way. And she is very smart! The media didn't like her because she wouldn't play their games and live her private life in public! Now, she uses the press to keep her private life private. Like I said, she's smart. And a great actress! And, btw, there was nothing wrong with Twilight. The best romance EVER!
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.She just does the same thing she always does--say the lines in a more or less flat way.Okay. I haven't even seen the movie yet....
Post a Comment